White to play and win
One worth spending time on: I didn't, getting the solution wrong.
Sokolov v Rushnikov, corres 1965-6
Solution
After a short while, I found the idea: Q to the h4-d8 diagonal, and if 1..b1(Q), then Re1 dis+. I then figured 'not 1 Qg5 because of 1…h6, and if 2 Qh4 g5 0-1’, and thought I had the solution, so entered the position into Stockfish, to write this posting. I therefore chose 1 Qh4
1 Qg5!:
So, firstly, I checked that 1 Qh4 was the same, but almost when entering the changed position, I realised 1…Rf4!; whereas after1 Qg5 there is no 1…Rf5 biff due to 2 Nf5. But what after 1….h6?
Stockfish played 2 Rb7+!!
2…hg 3 Nc6+ Ke8[] 4 Re7 mate. Lovely.
Black to play and win
Ujtelky v Kolarov, Batumi, 1966
Solution
Examine all biffs: after seeing that neither Nbd3+ or Ncd3+ work, the next try is 1…Be2+! and whatever White plays, one form of disaster follows, mostly involving a Nd3 invitation, forking.
Since the main, Teschner book puzzle is easy, a tougher problem from a recent (June 2015) edition of Chess Today.
Tougher, but one which is very pleasurable to solve.
White to play and win
Solution
1 Ne8+ Kg8 (1…Kh7 2 Rf7+ and mates; 1…Kh8 2 Qf8+ and mates) 2 Nf6+ Kg7 (2…Rf6 3 Qb7 Nb7[] 4 Rf6 + -)
3 Qf8+!! (the star move) 3…Kf8 4 Re8+ Kg7[] 5 Rg8 mate. Pretty.
White to play and win
Radulov v Sapurov, Bulgarian championship 1966
Solution
A nice, quite unusual but worth remembering solution. Yet again, it combines various CJS Purdy motifs.
There are two LPDOs in Black's position, his two bishops. And Black's Queen is in a bit of a net. Examine all biffs leads to 1 Ra4! Qc5[] 2 Rc4! Qa5[] 3 Rc7! forking the LPDOs.
White to play and win
Averbakh v Osnos, Kiev 1964-5
Solution
I found the winning 1 Nf6+!, either picking up at least a pawn after say 1…Ke7 2 Nd5+ cd[], when 3 Bf3 is probably the best way to pick the pawn up, with a dominating position; but Stockfish preferred 1 Rd5! cd[] 2 Nf6+ and it turns out Black's king can't avoid going to the mines square e7 ( 2…Kf8 3 Bh6+; 2…Kd8 3 Bb6+) when the LPDO Bb4 drops after the Nd5+ fork.
Checking on ChessBase online from my iPad app, Averbakh (who had a lifetime equal score against, for me, his unknown opponent) played 1 Rd5!
White to play and win
Mermagen v Kühne, corres 1966
Solution
I flunked this one, not being able to work out in my head whether 1 Qg6+!! works, and instead settling for 1 Nh5! which also wins, but not as nicely.
Firstly, my line: 1 Nh5! Ne5 (1…Nf8 2 Nf6+ Kh8[] 3 Qg8mate, the Nf8 blocking the Re8’s sight of g8) 2 Nf6+ Kh8[] 3 Ne5!, the point being that 3….Qf7 4 Nf7+ is mate; so 3…de 4 Qg6+ -.
But 1 Qg6+!! is forced mate, unless Black chickens out with 1…Kh8, when the win is prosaic.
So, 1…Kg6 2 Ne5+ Kf6:
Of course I saw this position, and even saw 3 Rf2+! but I thought it lost control over the Pd5 so that 3…Ke5 runs away, but then 4 Rf5mate, the move I missed. The Rd2 is a star performer.
So, instead. 3…Ke7, when 4 Nc6+
And capturing the Nc6 is forced: 4….Qc6; then 5 Bg5 mate.
What happened to me was typical. There are a lot of variations, a lot of ways that white could check and check, but too many responses to each; confusion struck, and I found a good alternative, but missed the best.






















