Skip to content

The Great British Chess Bake off: and the winner is…

There is a first time for everything, and this Christmas I have been the judge of a cake baking competition. Not that either baker knew they were competing.

The two finalists were: a well known bakery/cake shop in Manchester, and a Deloitte colleague, Fallon Nolan. Fallon will be one of my most missed colleagues when I finally retire from Deloitte in a couple of days' time, since she is always baking for us (her caramel shortbread being my favourite).

——

Somehow, my colleagues know that I have a slight interest in chess. First up, as a present after my leaving speech I was given this wonderful cake made by the (un)said well known bakery.

Next, at a team Christmas night out, I was presented with Fallon's masterpiece:
Judging
The astute reader might suspect favouritism, and might even be prepared to place a bet on who wins the Great British Chess Bake off. But no, in order to avoid bias, a scoring criterion was introduced: a series of technical bake and presentation questions.
Was the board set up correctly?
Key here, are there white squares on the right hand side. It would be minus many points if the right hand corner squares were black, something which often happens in films.
Both bakers set the board up correctly.
Is the position legal?
I have previously blogged (to my senior partner's ridicule, at my retirement dinner) about the ruinous effect of setting up the pieces in a random or incorrect manner.
 
Again, both bakers did well. The shop's position is a bit chaotic and wouldn't appear in a Grandmaster game (white is winning, easily) but is legal, whilst Fallon opted for setting up the pieces in their opening positions.
A slight plus on this count to Fallon, since she got all the pieces, including kings and queens, in their correct positions.
Which looked nicer?
Both were beautifully presented, with all the squares being square, everything as it should be. Compare the two photos.
 
Slight edge on this count to the shop made cake, since the Friday was also Christmas jumper day. (Maybe illogical, but often Mary Berry and Paul Hollywood make their judgments for odd reasons).
 
How did they taste?
On my last Friday, numerous colleagues had a slice of the shop cake. Everyone agreed it was lovely, moist, nice cream and jam; and the icing was very good too. I took a big chunk of cake round to some close friends, and of course pieces home to share with the family: everyone agreed that the shop cake was of grandmaster standard.
But Fallon's was even better: a 2800+ cake.
She had baked two different coloured cakes, and then cut and rebuilt them in checkerboard fashion. The darker, chocolately cake was perhaps the nicest cake I have ever had.
Any special features?
The shop bought cake had some nice 'happy retirement' writing, whilst Fallon also baked a couple of boxes of chess cup cakes for the department.
 
The cream on these cakes was lovely, so Fallon pips it on this test, too.
And the winner is?
It was actually no contest. The shop made cake was enormous, beautifully presented, tasted gorgeous, but the winner due to the even better taste (the chocolate cake was sublime) and the extra cup cakes (a super grandmaster innovation) was Fallon.
 
…and for good measure, Fallon is getting married to Tommy in two days time. Best of luck for the day and a lifetime of happiness together. I wonder if Fallon has baked her wedding cake?

 

 

Test your chess: daily chess puzzle # 107

White to play and win

 

 

D Morschel v P Kroon 1963-64

Solution

This puzzle took me one standard British unit of time, namely the time it takes to brew and drink a cup of tea, to solve. At first I couldn't see how to break through.

1 Kh2! frees the Rf2. If it is captured, 1…Qf2, then 2 Qf8+! Kf8[] 3 d8(Q) mate. If 1…e3 (say) then 2 Rf7! Rf7 3 d8(Q)+ wins. Finally, if 1…Qd5 (as played) then 2 Qf6 and there is no perpetual: 2…Qh5+ 3 Kg1 Qd1+ 4 Rd1 and there are no more checks.

 

My chess sets: My most used set: red, white pieces, wooden peg board, travel set

This is an occasional series of postings inspired by a brief discussion on the flight home from Turkey this summer. The flight attendant saw I was reading a chess book (quelle surprise) and, just making polite small talk, said she also liked playing chess, saying that depending on whether other crew members played, she would play on stopovers. Later in the flight she asked me if I had a chess set at home…and that set me thinking. How many chess sets do I have? And since then number is, well, shall we say, quite high, I thought I would blog about them especially those which ‘mean something to me’.

My first pocket set

History
I can’t remember when I obtained this set, but it was in my very earliest years as a chess player. And it soon became my all-the-time set, using It to pore over as many books as I could lay my hands on, including my first chess book, Harry Golombek’s Game of chess.
Over time, the zip stuck and became difficult to open and close; and later, somehow, one of the red knights was lost, as can be seen in the picture.
Feeling about the set
I treasure this set, even though I no longer use it, preferring either a full sized set or magnetic ones. To me, this set reflects not days, not months, but years of my teenage years.
One of my favourite sets.
Rating
10/10: one never to part with.

My chess sets: my first ever set

This is an occasional series of postings inspired by a brief discussion on the flight home from Turkey this summer. The flight attendant saw I was reading a chess book (quelle surprise) and, just making polite small talk, said she also liked playing chess, saying that depending on whether other crew members played, she would play on stopovers.

Later in the flight she asked me if I had a chess set at home…and that set me thinking. How many chess sets do I have? And since then number is, well, shall we say, quite high, I thought I would blog about them especially those which 'mean something to me'.

 

Where better to start this series than with my first set?

History
Since I started playing chess in the build up to the 1972 Fischer Spassky match, this set would have been bought in 1971, when I was nine.
I used to play with the pieces with a cheap green and white plastic roll up board, which, to my recollection, never unrolled fully, later replaced with a black and white cardboard board: in preparing this series of blogs I have not come across either, but hope I will do so one day.
The pieces have a nice, heavy, feel to them. They are nice to handle; neither I nor my parents (neither of whom played chess) knew that the Staunton design where de riguer: I would have time a plenty to but Staunton sets in the years to come.
Feeling about the set
You never forget the first time….and nor will I ever forget this set. It will always have a fond place in my heart.
Rating
10/10: one never to part with.

Test your chess: daily chess puzzle # 106

White to play and win

 

C Meiboom v PE Van der Walt 1986

 

Solution

I first took a journey down the wrong path, trying to make 1 Bb5+? work, but it doesn't: 1…ab 2 Nb5 Ra2 3 Nc7+ and now not 3…Ke7, which I liked, seeing 4 Bc5+ Kf6[] 5 Ne8 mate, but 3…Kd7 kills the fun.

Then, I quickly tried 1 Nb5? which is just as bad, before finding the right move, 1 Nd5 and white wins material: if 1…ed 2 Bd5 and the Ra8 drops off.

 

Test your chess: daily chess puzzle # 105

White to play and win

CC de Villiers v DA Walker 1981
Solution
This is perhaps one which you either see quickly or not all. Fortunately on this occasion I saw 1 Na7! on inspection, after which only a bit of calculation was needed to check that it works.
1…Ra7 2 b5 traps the queen, and if 1…Nb4, 2 Nb4 wins a piece: e.g. 2…Qb6 3 Nc8.
—-
For completeness, 1 e5! also wins, nicely: the h1-a8 diagonal is opened, so either a discovered check or attack wins.
 

 

Test your chess: daily chess puzzle # 104

Black to play and win

 

 

A Memmel v I Peenz 1985

 

Solution

A nice calculation exercise today. The first move, 1…Ne4!, is obvious, and, even if it weren't , would need to be looked at because of examine all biffs.

White must take the queen, after which 2..Bb4+ 3 Ke2 Rf2+ 4 Ke3[], but is it mate?

A quick further piece of calculation proves it is: 4…Bc5+ 5 Ke4[] Rf4+ 6 Ke5[] Bd6, a sort of staircase mate with rook and bishop.

 

 

 

Test your chess: daily chess puzzle # 103

White to play and win

D Gluckman v R Gwaze 2000

Solution

A rest day today: 1 f4 and black's king is in a mating net.

If 1…Kf5, 2 Kf3, and the net is preserved, one line being 2…Rc6 3 Rf7+ Rf6[] 4 Rb7 and if the N moves, 5 Rb5+ 1-0.

 

 

Test your chess: daily chess puzzle # 102

White to play: is it won or drawn?

 

 

AJ Cameron v H Meihuizen 1910

Solution

In the game, white repeated by 1 Qh5+, 2 Qh5+, with a draw: which, if I were white, I would do too, fearing that if I tried to play for a win, then I would risk losing, especially given black has many defences.

Reitstein says that close analysis at the time convinced everyone that white could have won by 1 Bh6! which of course is the natural try. I was put off from 'playing it' (I try to mirror, to the extent I can, the thinking in a game when solving these daily puzzles, though of course it is not fully possible) by 1…Qd7, thinking that it wasn't clear after 2 Bg7+ Kh7[].

However, Stockfish tells me that white is clearly winning (+6) after 3 Qh5+! Kg7 4 Rf1!

At first blush, that this is so seems extraordinary, but by looking at the positron, the reasons became apparent. Black's rook and queen's bishop are out of play; the Bc5 is LPDO; the N can come to e4; if the Bc8 develops on e6, then the e5 pawn drops off…black does indeed seem to be lost.

Back to the main line: 1 Bh6 gh 2 Qe8+ Kg7 3 Rf1:

Reitstein says that at the time, white's threats were thought to be overwhelming, so that the conclusion was that white was winning, until this century (the book was published in 2005) Fritz found 3…Bh3!! with a draw:

4 Qa8 Bg2+ 5 Kg2[] Qg4+ 6 Kh1 Qh3!!

7 Rg1+ and black has a perpetual.

So, Reitstein concludes it was a draw.

But is it? Stockfish (2014) suggests 1 Bh6 gh 2 Rd1!!

The engine doesn't like 2…Qd1+ 3 Nd1 Bg4, defeating it by 4 Qc4, exchanging one of black's bishops, so that it results in Q v R+B where black's king is open, and some of his pawns drop off:1-0. So 2..Qh4 when 3 Qe8+! Kh7 (3…Kg7? 4 Qe5+ and the LPDOS Bc5 drops off due to the fork) 4 Rf1!

There is a ever so subtle but key difference between the above position and the previous line in which Bh3!! saved the day. The difference is not that the black queen is on h4, but that the black king is on h7! (and not on g7). So 4…Bh3 doesn't now work because 5 Qa8 Bg2+ 6 Kg2[] Qg4+ 7 Kh1[] Qh3 which is very similar except that white can now play 8 Rf7+! since the K is not on g7, so the rook can't be captured. 8…Kg6[] 9 Qg8+ Kh5[] 10 Ne4 1-0 (or 9 Qe8).

So, I suspect, after all, it is a win, but by a subtle change of move order. Chess is a truly deep game.

I am not sure what I have written is the last word in 2014, or whether Komodo or another supremely strong engine could find yet more depths. As I finish this posting, Stockfish is pretty confident that 1 Bh6 is winning. As an aside, at first it liked 1 Bg5, but then after 1…Bg4 2 Qc7 Rf8 it assesses the position as 0.0, giving the line 3 h3 Bf3!! 4 gf Qf2! 5 Qb7 Qg3!!- high class tip toeing, for sure.

Overall, an excellent puzzle: one for Aagaardian analysis, or for an article by Dvortesky.

 

Test your chess: daily chess puzzle # 101

White to play and win

 

 

P Aalbersberg v I Friedman 1965

 

Solution

Slightly unsatisfactory today, since many lines win. I preferred the move played in the game, 1 Rf6, though it is not really any better than 1 Nf6+; 1 Qd4 (which the engine prefers); or 1 Rf3 (a good old fashioned rook lift, also favoured by Stockfish.

None lead to a quick 1-0, but all lead to a +2 or similar evaluation, so on this occasion I won't give detailed lines.